<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enabling Extension Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/</link>
	<description>firefox extension development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:57:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DAC324</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-15100</link>
		<dc:creator>DAC324</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/#comment-15100</guid>
		<description>I found the culprit: Add-On updates are only allowed for add-on types 2 (extension) and 4 (theme) but not for 8 (locale). So I had to change the add-on type to 2 in order to enable updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the culprit: Add-On updates are only allowed for add-on types 2 (extension) and 4 (theme) but not for 8 (locale). So I had to change the add-on type to 2 in order to enable updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAC324</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-15099</link>
		<dc:creator>DAC324</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/#comment-15099</guid>
		<description>Does not work no matter what I tried.

There are different approaches for &lt;em&gt; in the install.rdf file, some just like this:

&lt;em&gt;http://home.arcor.de/dac324/firefox/germanlocale/update.rdf&lt;/em&gt;

Is this really necessary?

My update.rdf resides here:

http://home.arcor.de/dac324/firefox/germanlocale/update.rdf

I have version set to 0.0.1 in install.rdf and 0.2 in update.rdf. However, Firefox (3.0a7pre) tells me that it can not find any updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does not work no matter what I tried.</p>
<p>There are different approaches for <em> in the install.rdf file, some just like this:</p>
<p></em><em><a href="http://home.arcor.de/dac324/firefox/germanlocale/update.rdf" rel="nofollow">http://home.arcor.de/dac324/firefox/germanlocale/update.rdf</a></em></p>
<p>Is this really necessary?</p>
<p>My update.rdf resides here:</p>
<p><a href="http://home.arcor.de/dac324/firefox/germanlocale/update.rdf" rel="nofollow">http://home.arcor.de/dac324/firefox/germanlocale/update.rdf</a></p>
<p>I have version set to 0.0.1 in install.rdf and 0.2 in update.rdf. However, Firefox (3.0a7pre) tells me that it can not find any updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myip</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-14672</link>
		<dc:creator>Myip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 13:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/#comment-14672</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your time and efforts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your time and efforts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanRoberts</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-11966</link>
		<dc:creator>DanRoberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/#comment-11966</guid>
		<description>Well I spoke too soon. I looked at the update.rdf for some of the extensions I use and noticed they don&#039;t use the brackets {} if not using a GUID. Once I removed the brackets in the update.rdf file the updated version was detected and the update ran fine. Thanks for the tutorial!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I spoke too soon. I looked at the update.rdf for some of the extensions I use and noticed they don&#8217;t use the brackets {} if not using a GUID. Once I removed the brackets in the update.rdf file the updated version was detected and the update ran fine. Thanks for the tutorial!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanRoberts</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-11965</link>
		<dc:creator>DanRoberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/#comment-11965</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know of a fix for what mojo describes above (id=name@domain) -- or know for sure whether this is a problem? When I try to find updates for my extension it says no updates were found though my update.rdf is a version higher and everything else appears to comply with the tutorial above. Thanks for any help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know of a fix for what mojo describes above (id=name@domain) &#8212; or know for sure whether this is a problem? When I try to find updates for my extension it says no updates were found though my update.rdf is a version higher and everything else appears to comply with the tutorial above. Thanks for any help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-11935</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/#comment-11935</guid>
		<description>Try emptying your cache and re-visiting your update.rdf page in your browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try emptying your cache and re-visiting your update.rdf page in your browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bahram</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-10938</link>
		<dc:creator>Bahram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 06:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/#comment-10938</guid>
		<description>Hi,
i created my auto update rdf file, and added the MIME type, hoverer it does not works, any idea?

here is the link to my update file:
http://68.178.173.234/downloads/localization/update.rdf

the current version in the xpi is 0.1 and in the rdf file 0.3, so the auto update should be triggered, what is wrong?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
i created my auto update rdf file, and added the MIME type, hoverer it does not works, any idea?</p>
<p>here is the link to my update file:<br />
<a href="http://68.178.173.234/downloads/localization/update.rdf" rel="nofollow">http://68.178.173.234/downloads/localization/update.rdf</a></p>
<p>the current version in the xpi is 0.1 and in the rdf file 0.3, so the auto update should be triggered, what is wrong?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyLeitrim</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-9585</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyLeitrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2005/03/09/enabling-extension-updates/#comment-9585</guid>
		<description>My update.rdf file is hosted on a webserver that requires regular authentication.  This means that the update check will fail unless the user happens to have logged in to the webserver lately.  Is there anything in the RDF specification that allows you to ask (or get) webserver credentials so firefox can check the update file?

Great tutorial BTW!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My update.rdf file is hosted on a webserver that requires regular authentication.  This means that the update check will fail unless the user happens to have logged in to the webserver lately.  Is there anything in the RDF specification that allows you to ask (or get) webserver credentials so firefox can check the update file?</p>
<p>Great tutorial BTW!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
