<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spammers have ruined it for the rest of you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/</link>
	<description>firefox extension development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:06:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maexx</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/comment-page-1/#comment-15117</link>
		<dc:creator>maexx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 06:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/#comment-15117</guid>
		<description>Had the same problem and added a visual code the posters had to type over and the problem was solved. I can&#039;t remember which plugin it was ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had the same problem and added a visual code the posters had to type over and the problem was solved. I can&#8217;t remember which plugin it was &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugmenot</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/comment-page-1/#comment-14645</link>
		<dc:creator>bugmenot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/#comment-14645</guid>
		<description>Maybe something like the Spamper MOD could help?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe something like the Spamper MOD could help?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The RedBurn</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/comment-page-1/#comment-13085</link>
		<dc:creator>The RedBurn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 10:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/#comment-13085</guid>
		<description>Phil,

I don&#039;t know why you need Allow Right Click.
You can just go to Tools&gt;Options&gt;Content and click on Advanced next to Javascript. You can then uncheck &quot;Disable or replace context menus&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why you need Allow Right Click.<br />
You can just go to Tools&gt;Options&gt;Content and click on Advanced next to Javascript. You can then uncheck &#8220;Disable or replace context menus&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkyKing</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12909</link>
		<dc:creator>SkyKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/#comment-12909</guid>
		<description>Eric,

Hey, spammers should be shot in my book.  LOL  Now, I&#039;ve written to you before and was told you would look into it but I haven&#039;t seen any progress.  The site www.d-a-l-l-a-s-n-e-w-s.com (hyphens used to hopefully keep them from seeing this post) has defeated your &quot;Allow Right Click&quot; extension.  Any updates on when you might be able to update it to defeat them right back?  It really makes using BugMeNot on their site a pretty big pain in the ass.

Thanks,

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>Hey, spammers should be shot in my book.  LOL  Now, I&#8217;ve written to you before and was told you would look into it but I haven&#8217;t seen any progress.  The site <a href="http://www.d-a-l-l-a-s-n-e-w-s.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.d-a-l-l-a-s-n-e-w-s.com</a> (hyphens used to hopefully keep them from seeing this post) has defeated your &#8220;Allow Right Click&#8221; extension.  Any updates on when you might be able to update it to defeat them right back?  It really makes using BugMeNot on their site a pretty big pain in the ass.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11955</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/#comment-11955</guid>
		<description>DLE, thanks for the tip. That makes sense, that just never occurred to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLE, thanks for the tip. That makes sense, that just never occurred to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLE</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11952</link>
		<dc:creator>DLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/#comment-11952</guid>
		<description>The problem is Spam Karma&#039;s &quot;Snowball Effect&quot; setting. Disable it completely and you&#039;ll have no more problems.

Snowball assigns positive karma to any comment that successfully makes it through the rest of the filters. In theory, this benefits frequent (good) commenters. This is the backdoor, though, for spam. If even one piece of spam makes it through, it gets a positive snowball score.

What happens is Spam Karma&#039;s normal settings fail to stop a couple spam comments. Those comments get a positive snowball score as a result. More spam gets positive scores if sent from the same &quot;snowball approved&quot; spam source. The blogger, scratching his head, ratchets all the Spam Karma filters up to &quot;supastrong,&quot; but they seem to stop nothing anymore. That&#039;s because the snowball effect setting is overriding everything else. It&#039;s already recorded the old spam as being legit, so now it assigns enough karma points so that the new spam&#039;s final karmascore is always positive, no matter what the other filters are set to.

Once I figured this out, I had no more problems; Spam Karma&#039;s caught everything since then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is Spam Karma&#8217;s &#8220;Snowball Effect&#8221; setting. Disable it completely and you&#8217;ll have no more problems.</p>
<p>Snowball assigns positive karma to any comment that successfully makes it through the rest of the filters. In theory, this benefits frequent (good) commenters. This is the backdoor, though, for spam. If even one piece of spam makes it through, it gets a positive snowball score.</p>
<p>What happens is Spam Karma&#8217;s normal settings fail to stop a couple spam comments. Those comments get a positive snowball score as a result. More spam gets positive scores if sent from the same &#8220;snowball approved&#8221; spam source. The blogger, scratching his head, ratchets all the Spam Karma filters up to &#8220;supastrong,&#8221; but they seem to stop nothing anymore. That&#8217;s because the snowball effect setting is overriding everything else. It&#8217;s already recorded the old spam as being legit, so now it assigns enough karma points so that the new spam&#8217;s final karmascore is always positive, no matter what the other filters are set to.</p>
<p>Once I figured this out, I had no more problems; Spam Karma&#8217;s caught everything since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11868</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 04:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/#comment-11868</guid>
		<description>What sucks is that the scripts actually stop the majority of them. In the last 7 days, an average of 147 spam comments have gotten in daily, while 6,763 have been blocked. That&#039;s better than a 95% success rate.

That&#039;s just retarded. I&#039;m about 2 seconds away from disabling comments permanently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What sucks is that the scripts actually stop the majority of them. In the last 7 days, an average of 147 spam comments have gotten in daily, while 6,763 have been blocked. That&#8217;s better than a 95% success rate.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just retarded. I&#8217;m about 2 seconds away from disabling comments permanently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlliXSenoS</title>
		<link>http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/comment-page-1/#comment-11867</link>
		<dc:creator>AlliXSenoS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roachfiend.com/archives/2006/11/15/spammers-have-ruined-it-for-the-rest-of-you/#comment-11867</guid>
		<description>I think the basic idea is to get links on to your site which then gets crawled by googlebot and they get pagerank.

but it is weird that that many get by all of the scripts that you mentioned... can you see how many get stopped by the scripts? if it&#039;s below 95%, something&#039;s wrong :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the basic idea is to get links on to your site which then gets crawled by googlebot and they get pagerank.</p>
<p>but it is weird that that many get by all of the scripts that you mentioned&#8230; can you see how many get stopped by the scripts? if it&#8217;s below 95%, something&#8217;s wrong :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
